Home > Dive Into Python > Unit Testing > Handling changing requirements | << >> | ||||
diveintopython.org Python for experienced programmers |
Despite your best efforts to pin your customers to the ground and extract exact requirements from them on pain of horrible nasty things involving scissors and hot wax, requirements will change. Most customers don't know what they want until they see it, and even if they do, they aren't that good at articulating what they want precisely enough to be useful. And even if they do, they'll want more in the next release anyway. So be prepared to update your test cases as requirements change.
Suppose, for instance, that we wanted to expand the range of our Roman numeral conversion functions. Remember the rule that said that no character could be repeated more than three times? Well, the Romans were willing to make an exception to that rule by having 4 M characters in a row to represent 4000. If we make this change, we'll be able to expand our range of convertible numbers from 1..3999 to 1..4999. But first, we need to make some changes to our test cases.
Example 6.27. Modifying test cases for new requirements (romantest71.py)
If you have not already done so, you can download this and other examples used in this book.
import roman71 import unittest class KnownValues(unittest.TestCase): knownValues = ( (1, 'I'), (2, 'II'), (3, 'III'), (4, 'IV'), (5, 'V'), (6, 'VI'), (7, 'VII'), (8, 'VIII'), (9, 'IX'), (10, 'X'), (50, 'L'), (100, 'C'), (500, 'D'), (1000, 'M'), (31, 'XXXI'), (148, 'CXLVIII'), (294, 'CCXCIV'), (312, 'CCCXII'), (421, 'CDXXI'), (528, 'DXXVIII'), (621, 'DCXXI'), (782, 'DCCLXXXII'), (870, 'DCCCLXX'), (941, 'CMXLI'), (1043, 'MXLIII'), (1110, 'MCX'), (1226, 'MCCXXVI'), (1301, 'MCCCI'), (1485, 'MCDLXXXV'), (1509, 'MDIX'), (1607, 'MDCVII'), (1754, 'MDCCLIV'), (1832, 'MDCCCXXXII'), (1993, 'MCMXCIII'), (2074, 'MMLXXIV'), (2152, 'MMCLII'), (2212, 'MMCCXII'), (2343, 'MMCCCXLIII'), (2499, 'MMCDXCIX'), (2574, 'MMDLXXIV'), (2646, 'MMDCXLVI'), (2723, 'MMDCCXXIII'), (2892, 'MMDCCCXCII'), (2975, 'MMCMLXXV'), (3051, 'MMMLI'), (3185, 'MMMCLXXXV'), (3250, 'MMMCCL'), (3313, 'MMMCCCXIII'), (3408, 'MMMCDVIII'), (3501, 'MMMDI'), (3610, 'MMMDCX'), (3743, 'MMMDCCXLIII'), (3844, 'MMMDCCCXLIV'), (3888, 'MMMDCCCLXXXVIII'), (3940, 'MMMCMXL'), (3999, 'MMMCMXCIX'), (4000, 'MMMM'), (4500, 'MMMMD'), (4888, 'MMMMDCCCLXXXVIII'), (4999, 'MMMMCMXCIX')) def testToRomanKnownValues(self): """toRoman should give known result with known input""" for integer, numeral in self.knownValues: result = roman71.toRoman(integer) self.assertEqual(numeral, result) def testFromRomanKnownValues(self): """fromRoman should give known result with known input""" for integer, numeral in self.knownValues: result = roman71.fromRoman(numeral) self.assertEqual(integer, result) class ToRomanBadInput(unittest.TestCase): def testTooLarge(self): """toRoman should fail with large input""" self.assertRaises(roman71.OutOfRangeError, roman71.toRoman, 5000) def testZero(self): """toRoman should fail with 0 input""" self.assertRaises(roman71.OutOfRangeError, roman71.toRoman, 0) def testNegative(self): """toRoman should fail with negative input""" self.assertRaises(roman71.OutOfRangeError, roman71.toRoman, -1) def testDecimal(self): """toRoman should fail with non-integer input""" self.assertRaises(roman71.NotIntegerError, roman71.toRoman, 0.5) class FromRomanBadInput(unittest.TestCase): def testTooManyRepeatedNumerals(self): """fromRoman should fail with too many repeated numerals""" for s in ('MMMMM', 'DD', 'CCCC', 'LL', 'XXXX', 'VV', 'IIII'): self.assertRaises(roman71.InvalidRomanNumeralError, roman71.fromRoman, s) def testRepeatedPairs(self): """fromRoman should fail with repeated pairs of numerals""" for s in ('CMCM', 'CDCD', 'XCXC', 'XLXL', 'IXIX', 'IVIV'): self.assertRaises(roman71.InvalidRomanNumeralError, roman71.fromRoman, s) def testMalformedAntecedent(self): """fromRoman should fail with malformed antecedents""" for s in ('IIMXCC', 'VX', 'DCM', 'CMM', 'IXIV', 'MCMC', 'XCX', 'IVI', 'LM', 'LD', 'LC'): self.assertRaises(roman71.InvalidRomanNumeralError, roman71.fromRoman, s) def testBlank(self): """fromRoman should fail with blank string""" self.assertRaises(roman71.InvalidRomanNumeralError, roman71.fromRoman, "") class SanityCheck(unittest.TestCase): def testSanity(self): """fromRoman(toRoman(n))==n for all n""" for integer in range(1, 5000): numeral = roman71.toRoman(integer) result = roman71.fromRoman(numeral) self.assertEqual(integer, result) class CaseCheck(unittest.TestCase): def testToRomanCase(self): """toRoman should always return uppercase""" for integer in range(1, 5000): numeral = roman71.toRoman(integer) self.assertEqual(numeral, numeral.upper()) def testFromRomanCase(self): """fromRoman should only accept uppercase input""" for integer in range(1, 5000): numeral = roman71.toRoman(integer) roman71.fromRoman(numeral.upper()) self.assertRaises(roman71.InvalidRomanNumeralError, roman71.fromRoman, numeral.lower()) if __name__ == "__main__": unittest.main()
Now our test cases are up to date with our new requirements, but our code is not, so we expect several of our test cases to fail.
Example 6.28. Output of romantest71.py against roman71.py
fromRoman should only accept uppercase input ... ERROR toRoman should always return uppercase ... ERROR fromRoman should fail with blank string ... ok fromRoman should fail with malformed antecedents ... ok fromRoman should fail with repeated pairs of numerals ... ok fromRoman should fail with too many repeated numerals ... ok fromRoman should give known result with known input ... ERROR toRoman should give known result with known input ... ERROR fromRoman(toRoman(n))==n for all n ... ERROR toRoman should fail with non-integer input ... ok toRoman should fail with negative input ... ok toRoman should fail with large input ... ok toRoman should fail with 0 input ... ok
====================================================================== ERROR: fromRoman should only accept uppercase input ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\docbook\dip\py\roman\stage7\romantest71.py", line 161, in testFromRomanCase numeral = roman71.toRoman(integer) File "roman71.py", line 28, in toRoman raise OutOfRangeError, "number out of range (must be 1..3999)" OutOfRangeError: number out of range (must be 1..3999) ====================================================================== ERROR: toRoman should always return uppercase ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\docbook\dip\py\roman\stage7\romantest71.py", line 155, in testToRomanCase numeral = roman71.toRoman(integer) File "roman71.py", line 28, in toRoman raise OutOfRangeError, "number out of range (must be 1..3999)" OutOfRangeError: number out of range (must be 1..3999) ====================================================================== ERROR: fromRoman should give known result with known input ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\docbook\dip\py\roman\stage7\romantest71.py", line 102, in testFromRomanKnownValues result = roman71.fromRoman(numeral) File "roman71.py", line 47, in fromRoman raise InvalidRomanNumeralError, 'Invalid Roman numeral: %s' % s InvalidRomanNumeralError: Invalid Roman numeral: MMMM ====================================================================== ERROR: toRoman should give known result with known input ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\docbook\dip\py\roman\stage7\romantest71.py", line 96, in testToRomanKnownValues result = roman71.toRoman(integer) File "roman71.py", line 28, in toRoman raise OutOfRangeError, "number out of range (must be 1..3999)" OutOfRangeError: number out of range (must be 1..3999) ====================================================================== ERROR: fromRoman(toRoman(n))==n for all n ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\docbook\dip\py\roman\stage7\romantest71.py", line 147, in testSanity numeral = roman71.toRoman(integer) File "roman71.py", line 28, in toRoman raise OutOfRangeError, "number out of range (must be 1..3999)" OutOfRangeError: number out of range (must be 1..3999) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 13 tests in 2.213s FAILED (errors=5)
Now that we have test cases that fail due to the new requirements, we can think about fixing the code to bring it in line with the test cases. (One thing that takes some getting used to when you first start coding unit tests is that the code being tested is never “ahead” of the test cases. While it's behind, you still have some work to do, and as soon as it catches up to the test cases, you stop coding.)
Example 6.29. Coding the new requirements (roman72.py)
"""Convert to and from Roman numerals""" import re #Define exceptions class RomanError(Exception): pass class OutOfRangeError(RomanError): pass class NotIntegerError(RomanError): pass class InvalidRomanNumeralError(RomanError): pass #Define digit mapping romanNumeralMap = (('M', 1000), ('CM', 900), ('D', 500), ('CD', 400), ('C', 100), ('XC', 90), ('L', 50), ('XL', 40), ('X', 10), ('IX', 9), ('V', 5), ('IV', 4), ('I', 1)) def toRoman(n): """convert integer to Roman numeral""" if not (0 < n < 5000): raise OutOfRangeError, "number out of range (must be 1..4999)" if int(n) <> n: raise NotIntegerError, "decimals can not be converted" result = "" for numeral, integer in romanNumeralMap: while n >= integer: result += numeral n -= integer return result #Define pattern to detect valid Roman numerals romanNumeralPattern = '^M?M?M?M?(CM|CD|D?C?C?C?)(XC|XL|L?X?X?X?)(IX|IV|V?I?I?I?)$' def fromRoman(s): """convert Roman numeral to integer""" if not s: raise InvalidRomanNumeralError, 'Input can not be blank' if not re.search(romanNumeralPattern, s): raise InvalidRomanNumeralError, 'Invalid Roman numeral: %s' % s result = 0 index = 0 for numeral, integer in romanNumeralMap: while s[index:index+len(numeral)] == numeral: result += integer index += len(numeral) return result
You may be skeptical that these two small changes are all that we need. Hey, don't take my word for it; see for yourself:
Example 6.30. Output of romantest72.py against roman72.py
fromRoman should only accept uppercase input ... ok toRoman should always return uppercase ... ok fromRoman should fail with blank string ... ok fromRoman should fail with malformed antecedents ... ok fromRoman should fail with repeated pairs of numerals ... ok fromRoman should fail with too many repeated numerals ... ok fromRoman should give known result with known input ... ok toRoman should give known result with known input ... ok fromRoman(toRoman(n))==n for all n ... ok toRoman should fail with non-integer input ... ok toRoman should fail with negative input ... ok toRoman should fail with large input ... ok toRoman should fail with 0 input ... ok ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 13 tests in 3.685s OK
Comprehensive unit testing means never having to rely on a programmer who says “Trust me.”
Handling bugs | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Refactoring |